Showing posts with label found photographs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label found photographs. Show all posts

Sunday, February 19, 2012

The Critical Analysis of a Snapshot




(click on images for a larger view)
WHAT MAKES A GREAT SNAPSHOT? As a general rule, many of the same things that one might use to judge any artwork fall into play. Connoisseurship in any field has its criteria. My good friend Brian loves great automobiles. If I were to ask him what makes a great automobile, I would guess him to say craftsmanship, performance, design, quality—those kind of things. Notice I didn’t say anything about cost. If I had asked him “what are the qualities of the most expensive cars in the world?” that is a different question altogether. Then, he might say something like rarity, being first. To that point, an 1898 one-off prototype of a steam-powered car (ugly, by many standards) might trump the very first Mercedes, for example. But then again, maybe not. But I have opened a can of worms here—in a field I know little about. I do know that the art—the design— of an automobile can give it immortality. Raymond Loewy’s Avanti, for example, still turns heads today if you would be fortunate enough to see one.

In the world of snapshots, or “vernacular photography” as they call it today, we have to understand the difference between the work of a trained photographer and that of an everyday snapshot shooter. We’ll call the everyday snapshot guy “Uncle Charlie.”

Uncle Charlie, who has his Brownie camera with him one day to get a few shots of his friend’s retirement party, is leaving work when sees a blimp flying overhead and remembers he still has a picture left. He thinks the sighting of a blimp unusual enough to want to record it. He tried to get directly under it but it is moving too fast. Charlie thinks: “Damn that building! If only I had a better shot! Oh, what the hell!” *Click!* When the pictures come back from the drugstore, he is probably bothered a bit by all the intrusions that came with the picture, like the pole, wire, the two buildings—but, he thinks, at least I got my picture. Mission accomplished.

Now, if the great modernist photographer Lee Friedlander happened to have been there on the same day, the last thing he would have wanted was a single shot of the belly of the blimp. Chances are he would have run to the alley and tried to get a shot similar to the one that Uncle Charlie took, which was basically by accident and default. Friedlander would have reveled in the juxtapositions of the blimp to the wire and the buildings to the blimp and seized upon that very moment. Could he have taken a better picture of that blimp on that day? Probably. But Uncle Charlie stumbled onto this great photo—in spite of himself. It is doubtful that this anonymous snapshot shooter allowed his mind to make the critical analysis that a trained photographer might have done.

So, what about that criteria? What do I look for in a great snapshot? Well, the great snapshots are absolutely rare. You have to figure that 99% of the time there is no negative, so this is all you will ever have of this particular view. What you are holding in your hand is the only existing image of this particular shot. For example, there are millions of pictures of men in hats. But only ONE like the one you see above. That makes it a one-of-a-kind. Add to that the qualities I list for you below—and you have a great photo.

When I look at a snapshot I look for the following things: (1) composition: simply, does it work as a picture? (2) tonality: does it have a full-range of values, from white to gray to black? Or, does it break this rule for something more dramatic or sublime? (3) content: what is it a picture of? Is the image unusual, with uncommon subject matter? Does it challenge me visually? Is there a surprise, something unexpected? Do I continue to see more the longer I look? (4) condition: Is the photo is good shape? Is it bent, wrinkled or damaged? Or, is it pristine?

(5) My last criteria, and this is personal to my collecting eye: does the snapshot remind me of something a great photographer might have taken? Is it a little Diane Arbus? Is it an “accidental” Weegee, Friedlander, Siskind, Steiglitz, Strand or other?

I’ll be showcasing some other snapshots from time-to-time. Thanks and stay tuned.

An AM repost from 1/15/09.

Friday, November 27, 2009

Two Snapshots of Two Objects

Click either image for a larger view.

WHAT QUALITIES MAKE A PHOTOGRAPH ABOVE AVERAGE? TO THAT POINT, WHAT MAKES A PHOTOGRAPH GREAT? Well, scholars and collectors have been mulling over that question for a century or so. Every time “the heads” think they have that question figured out, an artist comes along to turn that definition on it’s ear. Maybe that’s the answer then.

These two photographs I spotted on eBay are stunning examples of pictures that perhaps, and most likely, were never meant to be exceptional. More than likely they were made simply to document the objects in the photographs above. But something happened along the way in this anonymous person’s effort. They bumped into the extraordinary. Or, maybe extraordinary found them.

Photograph the new chairs and table! Easy enough. “Ah-h darn, the chairs are all leaning against the table, oh well, I’m not going down there to set them up.” Click. Done.

Or, maybe not. Did the photographer actually see the fact that the table and chairs had been arranged to now resemble a big white multi-legged bug sitting there in the diagonal shadow? Probably not. But maybe! Naa-aaaa. And that is where the fun starts in collecting vernacular photography. You, the collector becomes the photographer, a curator within a sea of bad photographs, searching for the images YOU say are worthy.

The photograph of the tent-like house is, like the table and chairs, exceptional in the presentation of iconic objects seen in a new way. With the table and chairs—they are no longer table and chairs. The photograph (from the high vantage point) has presented these utilitarian objects in such a way as to transform them. And the house—we are looking at an archetypal house shape, but there is no way in or out. No windows. No door. The covering hides the real house underneath. Or is it a house? As an image, it is simply planes of light and dark, photographed from slightly above. It is a strong image, in your face and slightly disturbing.

This is why vernacular photography is exciting. You, the viewer, have the opportunity to be the juror of the show, to award first prize to any image you think is worthy. You are the curator too, because you can select any image you think should be in your museum.

And if you do a great job in selecting the images for your “museum,” people will come.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Accidental Mysteries to Open at Wake Forest

(Above) Peabody Essex Museum; Salem, Mass. 2007 - 2008

(Above) South Shore Arts; Munster, Indiana 2008

(Above) Anonymous photo, collection of Accidental Mysteries.

(Above) Anonymous photo, collection of Accidental Mysteries.

(Above) The Art Museum of the University of Memphis; Memphis, TN 2006

(Above) Intuit: The Center for Intuitive and Outsider Art; Chicago, IL 2006

(Above) The Sheldon Art Galleries; Saint Louis, Missouri 2006

(Above) The DeVos Art Museum, Northern Michigan University; Marquette, MI 2008


WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY, IN MY HOMETOWN OF WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. will be the 7th venue to host the traveling exhibition Accidental Mysteries: Extraordinary Vernacular Photographs.” The exhibition opens at the Charlotte and Phillip Hanes Art Gallery on October 22 and runs through December 9, 2009.

I will be giving a talk on Thursday, October 29 at 3 pm in Room 9 of the Art Center. Learn more here. The university press release is also available.


The opening reception is Friday, October 30, from 5 pm to 7 pm. If you have never visited the Accidental Mysteries website, you can visit by simply clicking here.

If any AM blog readers are in the area, I would love to meet you.

If your museum or university art gallery would like to know how this exhibition can come to you, please e-mail me at: fosterdesign (at) charter.net.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Cassandra Jones: Found Photographs Reborn

Good Cheer Wallpaper #1 (Click image for larger view)
2005 Archival digital prints on 24” wide rolls
Site specific installations from found snapshot images

Good Cheer Wallpaper #1 (pattern)
(Click any image for larger view)

Good Cheer Wallpaper #1
(Site Installation at Nathan Larramendy Gallery)

(Click any image for larger view)

Good Cheer Wallpaper #1
(Installation at San Jose Institute for Contemporary Art)



Rare Avis Wallpaper (Click any image for larger view)
2007 Archival digital prints on 24” wide rolls
Site specific installations from found snapshot images

Cassandra Jones says of this series: “Rara Avis is a series of works composed of found snapshot photographs of real pink flamingos that are discernibly reminiscent of their retro plastic counter-part, the lawn ornament. I have found that one of the most common snapshots taken of a wading flamingo, indeed, to be the profile of the bird’s long, soft, curved neck and down-bent bill. This particular collection of photographs led me to wonder, is it possible that an item of now historical kitsch might influence the picture taking of the real, live thing? After all, Americans are much more familiar with the nature of the stylized, florescent version, than the actual bird itself.

(Click any image for larger view)


(Click any image for larger view)

Rare Avis Series
Composition #4, 2007

Archival C-print made from found snapshot photographs
Ed. 2

Size 24” x 36”

(Click any image for larger view)

Rare Avis Series
Composition #4, 2007 (detail)

(Click any image for larger view)

Rare Avis Series
Composition #2, 2007

Archival C-print made from found snapshot photographs
Ed. 2

Size 24” x 36”




Rare Avis Series (detail)
Composition #2, 2007



INTERVIEW WITH CASSANDRA C. JONES BY XENI JARDIN FOR BoingBoing.





CASSANDRA JONES MAY BECOME ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ARTISTS OF THE DECADE. Her artwork is intelligent and right for the times. Quite frankly, I have been waiting for an artist to come along who could find the right key to help define the massive proliferation of digital images there are floating amongst the internet. Cassandra Jones may be the one.

Take a sunset, for example. Jones asks: “does there really need to be another photograph taken of a sunset?” She’s exactly right. Don’t we have enough already? Jones quotes writer Susan Sontag who said, in effect, that “photographs of sunsets are cheesy because they have been photographed so many times.” How true. Cassandra Jones has taken the very subject of sunsets (please watch video) and extrapolated that to create a new interpretation of what it means to see “a sunset.”

Her Rare Avis series are equally compelling. These “invented” botanical specimens are created by using manipulated “found” images of pink flamingos, another kitsch symbol as trite as the sunsets she has used in the past.

You’ll see what I mean by all of this if you watch Cassandra’s video, which was done for the incredible web site BoingBoing.

Learn more about Cassandra C. Jones on her Web site here.

You might also like:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...